This is just plain funny!!! I had a long hard laugh. It's only 17 seconds long!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMNry4PE93Y
To Doron means the gift in Greek. I picked it because I figured the name would be available and I am learning Koine Greek with my kids. This blog contains information on things I have learned or found interesting or useful. Included are the following subjects: Classics, Great Books of the Western World, Homeschooling, Healthy Habits, Housekeeping, Religion and Economics.
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Monday, October 20, 2008
Jon Stossel's Politically Incorrect Guide to Politics
This is an excellent piece showing the ludicrous position of the government and how stupid it is to expect anything from the politicians or the government. The good things that we have in our society come from people. Just like we don't need a leader to tell which way to go when skating at an ice rink, we don't need leaders and politicians giving us regulations. It's called spontaneous order. He asks great questions and shows exactly what people have to go through to get anything done through government from building permits for New Orleans, to filling out paperwork to run for office, to farm bill subsidies. Let's get government out of the way!!! Go watch it on YouTube and you may find you feel the same way I do. Let's do something!!!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Phs6CwnutoY&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Phs6CwnutoY&feature=related
Saturday, October 18, 2008
John Adams mini series from HBO
My husband came back from Wal-Mart with this series and we've watched 2 episodes. It is pretty good so far. John Adams looks old and fat, and George Washington looks old and fat too. Most of the congressmen look like they are deathly ill and the American people in the film look extremely rough, but I got over it after awhile because the story is really great. It is based on the book, John Adams by David McCullough who also wrote 1776. I think it does a great job of portraying what it was like to live at that time and the real decisions these people faced.
The first episode shows the Boston Massacre and how John Adams defended the British in that skirmish even though it was unpopular to do so, and it introduces his relationship with his kids and wife, Abigail. The second episode shows him riding through the forest after the first battle at Lexington and Concord and how he joined the Continental Congress and worked to get them to support a continental army and later for independence. It is very sobering when the congress tries to put out an olive branch for the king and are answered with the threat of death if they continue their treason. It is also sobering at the end when they ratify the Declaration of Independence; no one cheers. One of the delegates didn't show up to vote because he felt it was not the right thing to do and did not want to vote for it in good conscience, but didn't want to keep the others from what they deemed to be their duty. It was so good!!
This is the stuff that makes history come alive and makes me want to check and see how accurate it really is.
The first episode shows the Boston Massacre and how John Adams defended the British in that skirmish even though it was unpopular to do so, and it introduces his relationship with his kids and wife, Abigail. The second episode shows him riding through the forest after the first battle at Lexington and Concord and how he joined the Continental Congress and worked to get them to support a continental army and later for independence. It is very sobering when the congress tries to put out an olive branch for the king and are answered with the threat of death if they continue their treason. It is also sobering at the end when they ratify the Declaration of Independence; no one cheers. One of the delegates didn't show up to vote because he felt it was not the right thing to do and did not want to vote for it in good conscience, but didn't want to keep the others from what they deemed to be their duty. It was so good!!
This is the stuff that makes history come alive and makes me want to check and see how accurate it really is.
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
3 plays by Aeschylus
I just wanted to record here that I tried to analyze these plays, did a search to make sure I understood them and found that I certainly did not!! There is a huge back story to these plays!!!! Before I read any Greek play again, I'm going to check out the plot summary and find out all the back stories, there were a lot of back stories to the Iliad too, like the Trojan horse that just simply are not written down in the story and you practically have to think like an ancient Greek to get it.
So here is what I wish I had known when I read Agamemnon, Choephoroe and Eumenides, this is a summary and not exact:
It all started with Agamemnon's grandfather, Pelops. Pelops won his wife unfairly in a chariot race and then murdered his accomplice afterward. But before the accomplice died, he cursed Pelops and his family. Then Pelops had 2 sons, Thyestes and Atreus. Thyestes commited adultery with Atreus' wife so Atreus banished him. Thyestes asked to come back and be forgiven and Atreus agreed and served him a wonderful banquet in which he served to Thyestes, Thyestes' own 2 murdered sons to eat. Thyestes was livid and left, and had another son, Aegisthus, possibly in an incestuous relationship with his remaining living daughter in order to avenge the deaths of his sons. And that is the curse referred to on the house of Atreus.
Atreus had two sons, Menelaus and Agamemnon. Menelaus married Helen who was stolen by Paris and taken to Troy which is what the Trojan war was all about. Agamemnon married Clytaemnestra who was the twin sister of Helen although Helen was fathered by Zeus and Clytaemnestra was fathered by a mortal. So anyway, Agamemnon of course wanted to help his brother for many reasons against Troy, but when they went to sail away there was no wind because the goddess, Artemis, was mad at somebody for killing a rabbit and demanded Agamemnon's daughter, Iphigeneia, as a sacrifice to atone for the rabbit. So Agamemnon delivered his daugher to be sacrificed at the temple of Artemis without the knowledge or consent of Clytaemnestra, her mother, and then he was gone to Troy for 10 years.
While Agamemnon was gone, Clytaemnestra hooked up with Aegisthus, the son of Thyestes, the cousin of Agamemnon, and they ruled Argos together and planned to kill Agamemnon when he returned. They sent Orestes, the son of Clytaemnestra and Agamemnon, into exile so that he would not be able to claim the throne, and treated Electra, his sister, like a slave.
The first play, Agamemnon, starts when Agamemnon is returning from Troy.
Also, interesting to note is that Cassandra, daughter of Priam, king of Troy, and the slave to Agamemnon, refused to have sex with Apollo at some point prior, and so Apollo refuses to help her in her need when she knows she will be murdered along with Agamemnon.
There!! I think I got it all!! After finding this all out, the plays have so much more meaning and depth. I will write about it after our next discussion as I'm sure we'll come up with some more interesting ideas!!! Wow!! Those Greeks had an imagination, no wonder we are still interested, it's quite the back story!!!
So here is what I wish I had known when I read Agamemnon, Choephoroe and Eumenides, this is a summary and not exact:
It all started with Agamemnon's grandfather, Pelops. Pelops won his wife unfairly in a chariot race and then murdered his accomplice afterward. But before the accomplice died, he cursed Pelops and his family. Then Pelops had 2 sons, Thyestes and Atreus. Thyestes commited adultery with Atreus' wife so Atreus banished him. Thyestes asked to come back and be forgiven and Atreus agreed and served him a wonderful banquet in which he served to Thyestes, Thyestes' own 2 murdered sons to eat. Thyestes was livid and left, and had another son, Aegisthus, possibly in an incestuous relationship with his remaining living daughter in order to avenge the deaths of his sons. And that is the curse referred to on the house of Atreus.
Atreus had two sons, Menelaus and Agamemnon. Menelaus married Helen who was stolen by Paris and taken to Troy which is what the Trojan war was all about. Agamemnon married Clytaemnestra who was the twin sister of Helen although Helen was fathered by Zeus and Clytaemnestra was fathered by a mortal. So anyway, Agamemnon of course wanted to help his brother for many reasons against Troy, but when they went to sail away there was no wind because the goddess, Artemis, was mad at somebody for killing a rabbit and demanded Agamemnon's daughter, Iphigeneia, as a sacrifice to atone for the rabbit. So Agamemnon delivered his daugher to be sacrificed at the temple of Artemis without the knowledge or consent of Clytaemnestra, her mother, and then he was gone to Troy for 10 years.
While Agamemnon was gone, Clytaemnestra hooked up with Aegisthus, the son of Thyestes, the cousin of Agamemnon, and they ruled Argos together and planned to kill Agamemnon when he returned. They sent Orestes, the son of Clytaemnestra and Agamemnon, into exile so that he would not be able to claim the throne, and treated Electra, his sister, like a slave.
The first play, Agamemnon, starts when Agamemnon is returning from Troy.
Also, interesting to note is that Cassandra, daughter of Priam, king of Troy, and the slave to Agamemnon, refused to have sex with Apollo at some point prior, and so Apollo refuses to help her in her need when she knows she will be murdered along with Agamemnon.
There!! I think I got it all!! After finding this all out, the plays have so much more meaning and depth. I will write about it after our next discussion as I'm sure we'll come up with some more interesting ideas!!! Wow!! Those Greeks had an imagination, no wonder we are still interested, it's quite the back story!!!
Monday, October 6, 2008
Tina Fey as Sarah Palin in VP debate on SNL
I just watched a few videos of Saturday Night Live impersonations of Sarah Palin because I heard it was funny. I hadn't paid much attention to Sarah Palin because I'll definitely be voting 3rd party so I figured it didn't matter to me, but I did watch a segment of the VP debate the other night. I didn't think much of it because she does seem like a nice person. Like I said I watched some of the parodies and I laughed, but then I had to watch the real interviews. I am flabbergasted!!! I am amazed at how close the impersonations are to the real thing. It's funny at first, and then it is kind of sad. Palin seems like a nice mom, but she is full of hubris. She doesn't know what the interviewers are asking sometimes and she seldom answers the questions. She spouts off every catch phrase about taxes and patriotism and job creation and Israel she's ever heard. She is so unprofessional, she acts like a person they just grabbed off the street. Unbelievable, what an embarrassment. It's not like I'm surprised, but what a sad disappointment for this country and for women at that.
Here's a link to the debate skit, the interview with Charlie Gibson is also pretty good and so is the one with Katie Couric, just google them: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/04/tina-fey-as-sarah-palin-i_n_131964.html
Also, some of you may find it interesting that Japan's market closed down 4 % on their Mon. and Russia started out very low and our futures market is looking like we'll have another low day tomorrow. Even with the bailout we crash!! What a mess!!! We'll see what happens.
Here's a link to the debate skit, the interview with Charlie Gibson is also pretty good and so is the one with Katie Couric, just google them: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/04/tina-fey-as-sarah-palin-i_n_131964.html
Also, some of you may find it interesting that Japan's market closed down 4 % on their Mon. and Russia started out very low and our futures market is looking like we'll have another low day tomorrow. Even with the bailout we crash!! What a mess!!! We'll see what happens.
Sunday, September 28, 2008
Ron Paul's Response to the President
This was an excellent rebutal to the ridiculous bailout plan now termed a rescue plan as Paul points out in his essay. It was very refreshing, informative and funny in places. I won't go into a lot of detail here because I think Paul's words speak for themselves. If you're not sure about what the heck is going on out there with all these failing banks and companies and buyouts, read this essay. I think it will shed some light.
We need as many educated people as possible, as Ron Paul says, go educate yourself and then educate and encourage others to do the same. If we don't educate ourselves, we could end up with something much worse, like the Amero or I don't know what else. Buy tangibles, things that have intrinsic value, have some cash on hand in case you can't get your money out of the bank, and as the LDS prophets have been saying for years: GET OUT OF DEBT and GET YOUR FOOD STORAGE!!!
Here's the link to this most excellent essay, it's not too long, please read it!!:
http://www.campaignforliberty.com
We need as many educated people as possible, as Ron Paul says, go educate yourself and then educate and encourage others to do the same. If we don't educate ourselves, we could end up with something much worse, like the Amero or I don't know what else. Buy tangibles, things that have intrinsic value, have some cash on hand in case you can't get your money out of the bank, and as the LDS prophets have been saying for years: GET OUT OF DEBT and GET YOUR FOOD STORAGE!!!
Here's the link to this most excellent essay, it's not too long, please read it!!:
http://www.campaignforliberty.com
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx
I have postponed posting on this because it was a little sobering to read and discuss even though I have been aware of what is in there for awhile. It is a very short piece probably about 30 normal pages (my great books pages have very small print and large pages, it was 15 pages in there), it is worth reading. It really doesn't take long. There are 4 sections.
The first section is about the proletariat (the people) and the burgeoisie ( the ruling class) and the problems between them and how the proletariat could oust the burgeoisie if they combined against them. He talks about some of the problems of capitalism such as how laborers are replaced by machinery and improved methods of production, there is a great problem of over production and the constant revolutionizing of methods and finding of markets cannot go on forever. I found myself agreeing that there are definitely some problems with capitalism. Then he talks about how the proletariat is the revolutionary class and they should combine against the evil burgeoisie.
The second section talks about how the proletarians should adopt the communist view. And he talks about how we should ban the private property of the rich beorgeoisie and abolish the family because burgeoisie husbands and wives are unfaithful to each other anyway and a few other things. He sets out 10 mandates to make a society where "the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all." They are:
1-Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2- A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3-Abolition of all right of inheritance.
4-Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5-Centralization of credit in the hands of the state by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6-Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.
7- Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringining ino cultivatioon of wastelands, and the improvemetn of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8- Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9-Combination of agriculture with manufacturning industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
10-Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of child factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production etc.
So this is the sad part, how many of these mandates have we adopted? Too many!!! Are we really a capitalist country anymore? In light of the recent and future bailouts, not to mention other indicators, I would say we most definitely are not. That is why I postponed this post. Our awesome America is simply not the same country it was 100 years ago. I don't think the communists stopped trying to implement their ideas when we had the red scare in the 50's; they just changed their approach or influenced people to adopt their ideas and here we are today in the United States following more than half the mandates for the communist manifesto.
In the third and fourth sections he talks about the socialist parties in Europe and how that is not enough. Communism will also abolish the differences between cities and towns and countries. Everybody will be equal. The best way to run countries and people is through communism and the above madates. This is the final paragraph:
The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communist revolution. The proletarians hve nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workingmen of all countries, unite!
The first section is about the proletariat (the people) and the burgeoisie ( the ruling class) and the problems between them and how the proletariat could oust the burgeoisie if they combined against them. He talks about some of the problems of capitalism such as how laborers are replaced by machinery and improved methods of production, there is a great problem of over production and the constant revolutionizing of methods and finding of markets cannot go on forever. I found myself agreeing that there are definitely some problems with capitalism. Then he talks about how the proletariat is the revolutionary class and they should combine against the evil burgeoisie.
The second section talks about how the proletarians should adopt the communist view. And he talks about how we should ban the private property of the rich beorgeoisie and abolish the family because burgeoisie husbands and wives are unfaithful to each other anyway and a few other things. He sets out 10 mandates to make a society where "the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all." They are:
1-Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2- A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3-Abolition of all right of inheritance.
4-Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5-Centralization of credit in the hands of the state by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6-Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.
7- Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringining ino cultivatioon of wastelands, and the improvemetn of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8- Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9-Combination of agriculture with manufacturning industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
10-Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of child factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production etc.
So this is the sad part, how many of these mandates have we adopted? Too many!!! Are we really a capitalist country anymore? In light of the recent and future bailouts, not to mention other indicators, I would say we most definitely are not. That is why I postponed this post. Our awesome America is simply not the same country it was 100 years ago. I don't think the communists stopped trying to implement their ideas when we had the red scare in the 50's; they just changed their approach or influenced people to adopt their ideas and here we are today in the United States following more than half the mandates for the communist manifesto.
In the third and fourth sections he talks about the socialist parties in Europe and how that is not enough. Communism will also abolish the differences between cities and towns and countries. Everybody will be equal. The best way to run countries and people is through communism and the above madates. This is the final paragraph:
The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communist revolution. The proletarians hve nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workingmen of all countries, unite!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)