Apparently there are a lot of confused parents out there. There are lots of books, classes, groups, shows and blogs on the best way to parent children. I'm all about progress and finding the best way to do things, but recently I have become extremely bothered by a couple philosophies floating around out there. Especially being a homeschooler, I come in contact with all kinds of people and ideas. So I'm going on the offensive in this post, because I just have to get it out and let people know that not all Utah Mormon homeschoolers are this way or have such strange ideas.
Here are some ideas I am very bothered by - mostly from the Utah Mormon homeschooling community in general:
All you have to do to raise bright, responsible, independent, good children is to provide them with the proper environment. Get rid of all the distractions in your life and their life including most of the toys including puzzles and legos, stacks of paper, dumb craft projects, television, computer, video games and anything else that might interfere with your greatness and your children's progress. Require your children to help you with the housework everyday, so they will gain discipline and your house will be a model of cleanliness and tidiness, but do not require your children to do any kind of academic work unless they really want to because you might squelch their natural love of learning. Model great scholarship to your children in the afternoons by reading great books and learning on your own. Call it Free Time for you and them, and make them use that time to do whatever they want on their own as long it does not involve any of the distractions you have already removed from the premises. The only interesting thing left in the house is books, so this will inspire and encourage them to read a lot. This is also free time for you to study, and you should not be bothered unless it is really important. Your home will be a place of peace and beauty this way. The children will feel more secure and will grow to be truly great only troubling themselves with the very best this life has to offer-- the best books, the best music, the best food, the best organization, the best education...., even though you don't require them to do academics.
Do you think I'm kidding? I wish I were. There are people who really do think this way. What an easy way to homeschool. The only thing you have to make sure your children do is clean your house in the mornings, and clean up after themselves which gives you the benefit of a constantly clean house-- every mother's dream. Then you have the afternoon to read or work on things you are interested in. No worries about curriculum. No encouraging the child to keep going even though it just got hard. No continual repetition or waiting patiently for the child to figure out that long word, or that weird story problem or to remember how to say something in another language. If the kid is not interested, they stop. There are no messes from children's "crafts" or a refrigerator cluttered with 10 drawings of the exact same thing. Everything is neat and orderly and clean and structured. What the mother says is law. The mother has figured out how to run a smooth domain with no mutiny, and has figured out to explain it so that it sounds like this is all done with the children's best interest at heart.
There are so many problems with that philosophy, I'm not sure where to begin. Most people, I think, can see that this is not a good way to raise or educate children. So instead of analyzing each piece separately I will just give an overview of what I think is a good, normal parenting philosophy and what has worked for me so far.
The children can make whatever messes they want as long as they can clean it up when they're done. If the children start misbehaving, I give them a warning that they will lose some thing or privilege they value if they are older, or they will have to go on time-out if they are younger. I do not threaten things I am not willing to follow through on. If I don't want to carry a kid all the way up the stairs to their room, then I will not threaten to take them all the way up to their room. The corner right there will work just as well, so that's what I'll threaten. I won't take away a privilege I really want them to have. Whatever I do threaten, I do follow through on. Consistency is key. A warning is necessary also, so that the child knows what he did wrong and what he needs to do to make it right. This also gives them a chance to explain themselves and sometimes I find that the situation is not what I thought it was. I try to be as fair as possible in each circumstance. I have to find out exactly what is going on, and if I can't, then they get a warning and a lesson on how to act properly and be nice to each other.
We do have certain rules that need to be followed such as no eating on the carpet, no jumping on the furniture in the front room, sitting still and being quiet during scripture reading, etc. When any of these rules are broken, then an appropriate consequence is given to fit the crime. For example, those who eat on the carpet get their food taken away. Those who yell at the dinner table get sent to their room on time-out. Those jumping on the front room furniture have to sit on the floor, etc.
That's pretty much it for rules and consequences. Be consistent!!
Then for parenting and ensuring that my children are receiving a proper education, we have decided to homeschool. This means that we have reviewed and picked the best curriculum for the various subjects we want them to know. We schedule and organize a time and place for that to happen. We have requirements for each child to fulfill. The children are responsible to keep track of their books and fulfill the assignments and chores we give them. Once they finish those, they are free to do as they please pretty much.
That's pretty much how we operate. The why we do that and what we hope to accomplish by doing that are subjects for another post. This is way too long already. I think it is pretty easy to see the difference between my idea of good parenting and educating and the idea of some of my fellow homeschoolers. My way requires me to do a lot with my children and follow through and work with them and guide them along their academic path, as well as provide lots of different opportunites for them to try and explore all different kinds of activities and ideas and eventually, I hope, find their passion. Some of my fellow homeschoolers ( thank goodness, not all) have chosen to let their children kind of fend for themselves when it comes to academics. They have also chosen to limit what their children can do as far as what is available to them, i.e. limited access to media, stacks of paper, art supplies, toys, etc. They have chosen to steer their children towards what they want for them i.e. great readers by having few interesting things available to them besides books and maybe piano or something similar.
So this incredibly long post is not for those already involved in this flawed thinking, although I do feel sorry for them. It is for those of you who may know some of these people and associate homeschoolers to this type of idea. Homeschooling has so many benefits and advantages and I want to do my part to define it the way I think will provide the best benefit for all. And that I think is to be a normal, caring parent who is involved with their children and guides and teaches and helps them along the way. I also want to point out that this has also been done and is being done successfully by parents who send their children to public and private school. Parenting is parenting. Thanks for reading!! Comments are welcome!!
8 comments:
It seems like a lot of the problems with the philosophies you mentioned come from taking good principles to extremes. There is something to be said, for example, for allowing a child to choose to learn. Active use of agency can enrich many activities. But neglecting to educate a child simply because they don't seem to prefer academia over alternate activities is a great disservice to the child-- and, in my opinion, poor parenting.
By the way, I just ran across your summary of "Wealth of Nations" by Adam Smith. It warms my heart every time I hear someone else has read that book. There has been a lot of economic research done since 1776, but it is interesting that most of Smith's original theories are still holding up.
Hello,
You left a comment on my blog regarding this topic, so I thought I would leave one on yours :) I actaully agree with what Dallin said....principles to extremes. I have a theory that all weakeness are strengths in excess. We may be harsh but also bold, we may be meek but also timid.
I agree that the headgates philosophy can be taken to extremes. We could take her picture of what she does in her family and assume that if we get up and have a devotional at 6 and work their bums off from 8 to 12 and then ignore them all afternoon while they have nothing to do because we took all the toys away that we would be wrong. BUT...I believe that this would be taking her words at face value. I have never been to her home so I cannot say, but I bet she gives her kids hugs, and reads to them and shares ideas from her own education with them, and teaches them in loving ways while they work together and play together. I bet she tells them what is important to her and listens to their hopes and dreams as well...and just because she doesn't express that in her article doesn't mean she doesn't do it.
In the scriptures it tells us that By their fruits ye shall know them. At my home this week my children have worked every day from 7 until 11 and I have been slightly unavailiable in the afternoons to their whims and the fruits are: My oldest daughter is reading Narnia, not because she wants to watch the movie like usual, but because she can't put it down she loves it so much. My son has read The three musketeers and Journey to the center of the earth this past week and narrated to me the things he liked and the things that he thought we silly and how you have to be careful of your friends...pretty amazing from a 9 year old who has never read a book more than 30 pages in his life until this week. My second son asks me every day what there is to do because he is bored I tell him I'm sure he will think of something...today I found him in the back yard saying a prayer. That is Something! My second daughter has given me about 50 hugs this week because her mother is no longer worried about the house and the cooking and the cleaning and everyone elses education...the mother has time to smile and say I love you and twinkle at her children. Those fruits have been very sweet to me. God gives us ears to hear and eyes to see and hearts to understand when we are ready for them. Some philosophies are not for everyone, but some principles....like free agency...are. A good parent, ofcourse disciplines, and regulates, and loves and enjoys their children. As a good parent I am requiring work(principle) and getting rid of distractions (principle) and loving and enjoying my children as much as possible....and for me and my house that means having a unique philosophy because I have seen some of it's fruit and they have been sweet and joyful to me and to my children.
to buzy bee-- I don't remember exactly what I commented on you blog and it didn't look like it had published.
Anyway, working is not bad, decluttering is not bad, reading is not bad, but if that is all you do, and that is all you expose your kids to, then that is a shame.
Children need to be allowed to explore the world around them. They need parents to teach them and talk with them and show them the way. Children need to feel good about themselves and they need to feel proud of their lousy drawings and unuseful crafts. The message of the headgates philosophy in particular from reading her book to the children is that childish things are not valued or appreciated. Where is the joy in being a child and discovering so much for the first time. What is wrong with exploring the same picture using different mediums and using tons of paper?
This has gone very extreme and it is very sad to me to hear about how these children are being raised. They are missing out some of the joys of being a child. And it's all done in the name of "principle".
-Thank you VERY much for sharing this. I've been going crazy trying to figure out if I should try some of the headgates philosophies. It is so nice to have a different opinion to consider.
Corri-- You made my day!!
I totally agree with your post. Anyone familiar with principles of child development would know that playing with toys is their work. I think that it is important to teach children how to manage the many choices in life so that they will be ready to handle it when they are adults. Many women never see how they dominate their home to the point that everyone can't wait to get away from them one way or another.
very good point anonymous- thank you!
Post a Comment